<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Canton Becker &#187; Photos &amp; Videos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cantonbecker.com/category/photo-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cantonbecker.com</link>
	<description>Music, Web Design, Projects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:19:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus E-620 Noise Reduction and Gradation (SAT)</title>
		<link>http://cantonbecker.com/photo-video/2009/olympus-e-620-noise-reduction-and-gradation-sat/</link>
		<comments>http://cantonbecker.com/photo-video/2009/olympus-e-620-noise-reduction-and-gradation-sat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 17:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Canton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photos & Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cantonbecker.com/?p=556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So far I&#8217;m enjoying my new compact digial SLR, the Olympus E620, but I&#8217;m having a lot of trouble deciding whether or not to shoot JPGs with built-in noise reduction (NR) and/or &#8220;Gradation&#8221; (SAT) settings. Shadow Adjustment Technology is something I usually do in-computer instead of in-camera, using iPhoto and/or Photoshop&#8217;s shadow / highlight adjustments. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far I&#8217;m enjoying my new compact digial SLR, the Olympus E620, but I&#8217;m having a lot of trouble deciding whether or not to shoot JPGs with built-in noise reduction (<em>NR</em>) and/or &#8220;Gradation&#8221; (<em>SAT</em>) settings. <em>Shadow Adjustment Technology</em> is something I usually do in-computer instead of in-camera, using iPhoto and/or Photoshop&#8217;s shadow / highlight adjustments.</p>
<div id="attachment_557" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><a href="/olympus-e620-noise-and-gradation"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-557" title="olympus-e620-noise-and-gradation" src="http://cantonbecker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/picture-21-200x121.png" alt="E-620 noise reduction / gradation test" width="200" height="121" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">E-620 noise reduction / gradation test</p></div>
<p>I figure I&#8217;m not the only person out there with this quandary, especially as the E620 risks being a little noisy, and using SAT can make that noise really jump out at you&#8230; But then again, you get photos that are so <strong>usable</strong> right out of the camera. So I&#8217;ve published a <a href="/olympus-e620-noise-and-gradation">webpage</a>  that makes it easy to compare how a couple of shots look different when taken with and without NR and SAT. You be the judge!</p>
<p><a href="/olympus-e620-noise-and-gradation">http://cantonbecker.com/olympus-e620-noise-and-gradation</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cantonbecker.com/photo-video/2009/olympus-e-620-noise-reduction-and-gradation-sat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flickr Photo Updates (Finally!)</title>
		<link>http://cantonbecker.com/photo-video/2008/flickr-updates-finally/</link>
		<comments>http://cantonbecker.com/photo-video/2008/flickr-updates-finally/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Canton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photos & Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cantonbecker.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hadn&#8217;t touched my Flickr account in a very long time. I think I&#8217;m still bummed out that Yahoo! bought Flickr. But there were a few fun photos I wanted to share, including this one: &#8220;Ocean: 1 Tank: 0&#8243; Found on a beach in Culebra, Puerto Rico. The US military used Culebra island for practice-bombing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t touched <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/canton/://">my Flickr account</a> in a very long time. I think I&#8217;m still bummed out that Yahoo! bought Flickr. But there were a few fun photos I wanted to share, including this one:</p>
<h2>&#8220;Ocean: 1 Tank: 0&#8243;</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/canton/2564333247/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-27" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="Ocean: 1 Tank: 0" src="http://cantonbecker.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/tank2-475x356.jpg" alt="Ocean: 1 Tank: 0" width="475" height="356" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Found on a beach in Culebra, Puerto Rico. The US military used Culebra island for practice-bombing from 1901 through to 1975. Leah and I had some great snorkeling adventures there, though it was a bit strange to explore this underwater world where you were as likely to encounter a manta ray as you were a bomb casing&#8230;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cantonbecker.com/photo-video/2008/flickr-updates-finally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

